Alleviation: An International Journal of Nutrition, Gender & Social Development, ISSN 2348-9340, Volume 11, Issue No 11 (2024): 1-15 © Arya PG College (College with Potential for Excellence Status by UGC) & Business Press India Publication, Delhi http://apcjournals.com, www.aryapgcollege.ac.in

Abstract

A hybrid between the sprint and long-distance disciplines, the 400-meter track event has ancient roots, descending from the ancient cultural "diaulos" run on foot, an ancestor to the modern Olympic race. At the Olympics, the men's 400m has been a permanent fixture since 1896, while the women have had their own event since 1964, giving rise to iconic moments and world records that have defined its legacy. The 400-meter track and field event has been in the Olympics since 1896 for men and 1964 for women. The event evolved from the “diaulos”, a two-Stadion race in the ancient Olympics. The 400-meter track has little narrative, evocative of some sort of bicycle racingor perhaps the Olympics but even in the fetid world of weird Olympics, the 400-meter track is appropriately stinky. From those humble beginnings, the event has advanced in parallel with the science of sport and these days athletes are using technologies such as GPS tracking, biomechanical analysis and physiological monitoring to hone their training and racing plans. The 400-meter track doesn't just have a legacy rooted in sports it informs urban planning, recreation and health promotion as well. With constant innovations in sports science, the track will simply continue evolving and redefining the limits of human performance and success.

Keywords: Olympic, Race, Track Athletics, 400m etc.

Introduction
The 400-meter track: an omnipresent aspect of contemporary athletics, with a storied and nuanced history encompassing organized sport development, standardizing efforts, and technical advancements in track construction and athletic preparation. While competitive running existed in ancient civilizations, modern track and field events such as the race that is now the 400-meter race were developed during the 19th century Europe, and especially England (Iskra et. al. 2021). Many of the early races were of undetermined distance as different tracks and courses were used, making it difficult to compare performances. Amateur Athletic Association in England was established to standardize the rules, distance, etc. in a competitive environment, which became one of the foundations for a more ordered competition (Rowing and Track Athletics 1906). As track and field began developing quickly into what it is today, the necessity for a universally accepted track length became abundant, and in time it was the 400-m distance came about as the standard race, offering a compromise between sprinting and endurance, as it continues testing an individual’s speed and endurance (Iskra et. al. 2022 & Sedeaud et. al. 2014).
The objective of this research paper is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the history and evolution of the 400-meter track, a pivotal event in the world of athletics. The study examines the key developments and factors that have shaped the 400-meter track, including the standardization of track dimensions, the advancement of training methodologies and racing techniques, and the broader cultural and social impact of this iconic event.
By tracing the historical trajectory of the 400-meter track, the research aims to uncover the dynamic interplay between sports, technology, and human endeavour. It investigates how the 400-meter track has adapted to and influenced.
Review of Literature
The contemporary debate consistent with athletics is one that spans many elements that make up the athlete development spectrum, including genetics, training, and socio-cultural aspects of the environment (Thomas et al. 2019). In addition, scientific innovation is highly vital to ensuring athletes’ well-being and progress in performance, thus generating greater focus on sports science and medicine (Ramírez et. al. 2020). Wearable sensors are an example of the use of technology in tandem with sports science where the continuous monitoring of athletes' physiological and biomechanical parameters are analysed (Seshadri et. al. 2019). Real-time monitoring of human physiological functions and performance makes wearable devices a significant trend in both athletic and healthcare environments (Li et. al. 2015). These sensors can provide important information for improving training regimes, avoiding injuries, and improving the general performance of the athlete (Aroganam et. al. 2019, Baca et. al. 2022, Rajšp & Fister 2020). With data obtained from wearables, professionals can personalize and refine interventions according to individual characteristics and responses to facilitate personalized and precise medicine (Porciuncula et. al. 2018). The future production can be predicted using machine learning using the changes in batting average, on base percentage and runs batted in data (Seshadri et. al. 2021).
Wearable technology and artificial intelligence algorithms are already poised to revolutionize health monitoring enabling personalized treatment and empowering patients (Secara & Hordiiuk 2024). Artificial intelligence models are gaining traction with wearables and point-of-care testing technologies (Yammouri & Lahcen 2024).
Methodology
The study aimed at how track surfaces have changed and their effect on athletic performance, as well as training and racing strategies that have emerged in response to the evolution of the track. One is able to contextualize those who make up the 400-meter track and the 400-meter family. It also includes using historical documents, archival footage and statistical data to follow how the 400-meter track evolved.
Many of our standard distant of the 400-meter track (still) were established through several factors, including international competition and comparable results at different places. The far-away 400m played a large part in establishing the distance, becoming part of the modern Olympic Games program since being introduced in 1896. World Athletics (formerly the International Association of Athletics Federations): Founded in 1912, one of its roles was also to standardize the numbers of events in track and field, and the dimensions and construction of the 400-meter track -- it specified lane widths, the radii of the curves and the materials of the surface of the track, among other details -- to provide consistency for competitions across the world. Cinder or dirt early tracks faced inconsistent footing and were at the mercy of the weather, track surfaces evolved and significantly improved athletic performance over time. Synthetic surfaces, beginning with rubberized asphalt, and later with track made with polyurethane (Having properties of grip, shock absorption, and energy return) resulted in less risk of injuries.
Results and Discussion
Data collected can lead to insights into athletic performance moving forward.
Information collected through wearable sensors is enabling more efficient training regimens to reduce injury risk and maximize performance (Chidambaram et. al. 2022).
The findings are significant not only for competitive athletics, but these also provide new insights into human physiology and biomechanics and the limits of human performance. Wearable technology and addition of AI algorithms are the next steps toward achieving personalized treatment and patient autonomy (Xie et. al. 2021).
The very history of the 400-meter track is connected to the evolution of training methods and racing tactics. In the early days, athletes would have run on rough methods of training, relying more on trial-and-error to see what worked for them and what didn't. With the development of sports science, coaches and athletes gradually adopted training methodologies (Such as interval training, strength training and plyometrics) to meet the needs of the 400-meter race. Modern athletes are using different strategies depending on their event, whether to start fast and hang on, or run a more controlled effort with a surge at the end (Casado et. al. 2020), compared to early runners, who tended to run an even-paced effort across events. The introduction of technology has revolutionized training as well, with athletes utilizing GPS tracking, biomechanical analysis, and physiological monitoring to refine their training and racing plans.
The 400-meter track has played an important role in the cultural landscape, being used as not only a measure of athletic success, but also a marker of national acclaim. The occasion has created countless memorable moments in sports history, as legendary athletes stretched the limits of human achievement and inspired generations of runners. Additionally, the 400-meter race has been a stage for social and political statements, with athletes using their platform to bring attention to important causes and fight for change. The formation of the World Anti-Doping Agency in 1999 illustrates the general agreement over the ban on performance-enhancing drugs in sport (Loland 2009). The 400m track has become entrenched not just in athletics but also in urban design and fitness.
The start of any running race may have a significant impact on the results (Kovacs et. al. 2018) The speed to react can be determining for race times (Kovacs et. al. 2018) apart from such crucial factors as the coordination, muscle strength and the timing (Borysiuk et. al. 2018).
Conclusion
And so it goes on - the story of the 400-meter track is not merely about the journey of its creation; it is about the journey of the human spirit itself, forever driven to excel. Starting as an informal race, the 400-meter has evolved into a highly standardized global event. With ongoing advancements in sports science, as well as emerging technologies, and the 400-meter track will continue to evolve well into the future, with increased boundaries of human performance and aspiration for future generations of athletes (Ehrbar 2015, Hanley et. al. 2018 and Hatchett et. al. 2021). The track can also influence place meanings, and individual or collective sense-making experiences (Vink & Varró 2019). Marketing and promotions opportunities, together with distinctive consuming environments (Teare & Taks 2021). Recent advances in wearable sensor technology have allowed continuous monitoring of athlete physiological and biochemical profiles (Seshadri et. al. 2019) that have real-time applications for training and performance optimization. The above will ultimately enable us to further understand human performance while providing new opportunities to the athletic domain (Shipway & Holloway 2010, Teare & Taks 2021).
References
1) Aroganam G, Manivannan N and Harrison D (2019) Review on Wearable Technology Sensors Used in Consumer Sport Applications. Sensors 19(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19091983.
2) Baca A, Dabnichki P, Hu CW, Kornfeind P and Exel J (2022) Ubiquitous Computing in Sports and Physical Activity—Recent Trends and Developments. Sensors 22 (21): 8370. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218370.
3) Borysiuk Z, Waśkiewicz‬ Z, Piechota K, Pakosz P, Konieczny M, Błaszczyszyn M, Nikolaidis, PΤ, Rosemann T and Knechtle B (2018) Coordination Aspects of an Effective Sprint Start. Frontiers in Physiology (9). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01138.
4) Casado A, Hanley B, Jiménez‐Reyes P and Renfree A (2020) Pacing Profiles and Tactical Behaviors of Elite Runners. Journal of Sport and Health Science 10(5): 537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.06.011.
5) Chidambaram S, Maheswaran Y, Patel K, Sounderajah V, Hashimoto DA, Seastedt KP, McGregor AH, Markar SR and Darzi A (2022) Using Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Sensing and Wearable Technology in Sports Medicine and Performance Optimisation. Sensors 22(18): 6920. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22186920.
6) Ehrbar JT (2015) Ethical Considerations of Genetic Manipulation in Sport. The Sport Journal https://doi.org/10.17682/sportjournal/2015.018.
7) Hanley B, Stellingwerff T and Hettinga FJ (2018) Successful Pacing Profiles of Olympic and IAAF World Championship Middle-Distance Runners Across Qualifying Rounds and Finals. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 14 (7): 894. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2018-0742.
8) Hatchett A, Dicks A, Proctor M and Trujillo A (2021) Characteristics of Competitive Baton Twirling Athletes. Journal of Sports Research 9(1): 1. https://doi.org/10.18488/90.v9i1.1609.
9) Iskra J, Matusiński A, Otsuka M and Guex K (2021) Pacing Strategy in Men’s 400 m Hurdles Accounting for Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Elite Athletes. Journal of Human Kinetics (79): 175. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2021-0059.
10) Iskra J, Przednówek, K Domaradzki, J Čoh, M Gwiazdoń, P and Maćkała K (2022) Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Pacing Strategy in Elite Women’s 400 Meters Hurdles Athletes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19 (6): 3432. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063432.
11) Kovacs AJ, Miles GF and Baweja HS (2018) Thinking Outside the Block: External Focus of Attention Improves Reaction Times and Movement Preparation Times in Collegiate Track Sprinters. Sports 6 (4):120. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6040120.
12) Li R, Kling SR, Salata MJ, Cupp SA, Sheehan J and Voos JE (2015) Wearable Performance Devices in Sports Medicine. Sports Health 8(1): 74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738115616917.
13) Loland S (2009) The Ethics of Performance-Enhancing Technology in Sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 36(2):152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2009.9714754.
14) Porciuncula F, Roto AV, Kumar D, Davis I, Roy S, Walsh CJ and Awad LN (2018) Wearable Movement Sensors for Rehabilitation: A Focused Review of Technological and Clinical Advances. PMR 10 (12): 1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.06.013
15) Rajšp A and Fister I (2020) A Systematic Literature Review of Intelligent Data Analysis Methods for Smart Sport Training. Applied Sciences 10 (9): 3013. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093013.
16) Ramírez L, Till C, Boyd K, Bennet A, Piscione M, Bradley J, Giuliano S, Leduc PC and Jones B (2020) Coopetition: Cooperation among Competitors to Enhance Applied Research and Drive Innovation in Elite Sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine 55(10): 522. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102901.
17) Rowing and Track Athletics (1906) Nature Portfolio. Nature (73): 605 https://doi.org/ 10.1038/073605a0.
18) Secara IA and Hordiiuk D (2024) Personalized Health Monitoring Systems: Integrating Wearable and AI. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications 16(2): 44. https://doi.org/10.4236/jilsa.2024.162004.
19) Sedeaud A, MarcA , Marck A, Dor F, Schipma J, Dorsey M, Haïda A, Berthelot G and Toussaint J (2014) BMI- a Performance Parameter for Speed Improvement. PLoS ONE 9 (2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090183.
20) Seshadri, DR, Li R, Voos JE, Rowbottom J, Alfes CM, Zorman CA and Drummond CK (2019) Wearable Sensors for Monitoring the Physiological and Biochemical Profile of the Athlete. Npj Digital Medicine 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0150-9.
21) Seshadri DR, Li R, Voos JE, Rowbottom J, Alfes CM, Zorman CA and Drummond CK (2019) Wearable Sensors for Monitoring the Internal and External Workload of the Athlete . Npj Digital Medicine 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0149-2.
22) Seshadri DR, Thom ML, Harlow ER, Gabbett TJ, Geletka BJ, Hsu JJ, Drummond CK, Phelan D and Voos JE (2021) Wearable Technology and Analytics as a Complementary Toolkit to Optimize Workload and to Reduce Injury Burden. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living (2). https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.630576.
23) Shipway R and Holloway I (2010) Running Free: Embracing a Healthy Lifestyle Through Distance Running. Perspectives in Public Health 130 (6): 270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913910379191.
24) Teare G and Taks M (2021) Sport Events for Sport Participation: A Scoping Review. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living (3). https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.655579.
25) Thomas CE, Chambers TP, Main LC and Gastin PB (2019) Factors Influencing the Early Development of World-Class Caribbean Track and Field Athletes: A Qualitative Investigation. PubMed 18(4): 758. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31827361.
26) Vink R and Varró K (2019) Running Rotterdam: On How Locals’ Participation in Running Events Fosters their Sense of Place. GeoJournal 86(2): 963https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10104-3.
27) Xie Y, Lu L, Gao F, He S, Zhao H, Fang Y, Yang J, An Y, Ye Z and Dong Z (2021) Integration of Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, and Wearable Technology for Chronic Disease Management: A New Paradigm in Smart Healthcare. Current Medical Science 41(6): 1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-021-2485-0.
28) Yammouri G and Lahcen AA (2024) AI-Reinforced Wearable Sensors and Intelligent Point-of-Care Tests. Journal of Personalized Medicine 14(11):1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14111088.